<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redesign in 20 minutes (11) &#8211; PokerStars &#8220;Fold&#8221; and &#8220;Check&#8221; buttons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.use.se/index.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.use.se/index.php/2009/11/15/redesign-11-pokerstars/</link>
	<description>the igaming &#38; user experience blog by Staffan Schroder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:39:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.use.se/index.php/2009/11/15/redesign-11-pokerstars/comment-page-1/#comment-4829</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.use.se/?p=963#comment-4829</guid>
		<description>Yep, really good. Hopefully PokerStars implement this one too! 
 
I love the idea of taking the focus away from the non-key or non-positive actions on pages to keep users on the &#039;right&#039; path... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, really good. Hopefully PokerStars implement this one too! </p>
<p>I love the idea of taking the focus away from the non-key or non-positive actions on pages to keep users on the &#039;right&#039; path&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StaffanSchroder</title>
		<link>http://www.use.se/index.php/2009/11/15/redesign-11-pokerstars/comment-page-1/#comment-4828</link>
		<dc:creator>StaffanSchroder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.use.se/?p=963#comment-4828</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,  
  
thanks for your comment. I hadn&#039;t thought about the options you talked about. Thanks for brining those to the table. A smaller button or just a link for the &quot;Fold&quot; option would work better then. And to be consistent in the alert, positioning the options in the same way as below. I&#039;ll update my post with another version which keeps the &quot;Fold&quot; button.  
Regards  
Staffan  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,  </p>
<p>thanks for your comment. I hadn&#039;t thought about the options you talked about. Thanks for brining those to the table. A smaller button or just a link for the &quot;Fold&quot; option would work better then. And to be consistent in the alert, positioning the options in the same way as below. I&#039;ll update my post with another version which keeps the &quot;Fold&quot; button.<br />
Regards<br />
Staffan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.use.se/index.php/2009/11/15/redesign-11-pokerstars/comment-page-1/#comment-4827</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.use.se/?p=963#comment-4827</guid>
		<description>Hi! 
 
Interesting idea but there is a few times where you might want to fold - even if you can check. 
 
You could, for example, not want to risk having to show a hand which you have played in a certain way, such as aces or even some rubbish hand that you&#039;ve made a play on, when you are sure you are beaten to maintain the mystery surrounding your action. Equally, you might want to get out of a hand that you are in to advance your position in a tournament - preferring to let short-stacks in a sit-and-go fight each other rather than risk doubling one or more of them up. 
 
Maybe this is a case for somehow reducing the focus on the negative action , fold, in favour of the positive action, check. Maybe a smaller button? 
 
M. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! </p>
<p>Interesting idea but there is a few times where you might want to fold &#8211; even if you can check. </p>
<p>You could, for example, not want to risk having to show a hand which you have played in a certain way, such as aces or even some rubbish hand that you&#039;ve made a play on, when you are sure you are beaten to maintain the mystery surrounding your action. Equally, you might want to get out of a hand that you are in to advance your position in a tournament &#8211; preferring to let short-stacks in a sit-and-go fight each other rather than risk doubling one or more of them up. </p>
<p>Maybe this is a case for somehow reducing the focus on the negative action , fold, in favour of the positive action, check. Maybe a smaller button? </p>
<p>M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

